Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@nospAm.hotmail.com> wrote in message
  erpHk.12753$bq4.12346@newsfe15.ams2
> strich.9993@gmail.com <strich.9993@gmail.com> wrote in message
>  c2b8b434-b4af-4473-b17c-dba2e6892fe0@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com
> 
> [snip to essence]
> 
>> Do not change the topic.  The calculations are simple.
>> 
>> Let E1=M1.
>> 
>> If E1=E2 and M1=M2
>> 
>> Then E2=M2.
>> 
>> Where does it become confusing for you?
> 
> You remind me of another logic-idiot, calling itself "Allyou!"
> Oh yes, if your kind of logic allows you to use 4 variables
> E1, M1, E2 and M2 for 8 carefully defined quantities, then
> the theory is certainly illogical.
> 
> As was explained to you in
>  http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/e6df3b52be1e7860 ,
> as a reply to
>  https://home.deds.nl/~dvdm/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/DisprovenForGood.html ,
> 1) before M is set in motion:
>    Tick/tock on clock at rest in E:
>        rate w.r.t E-clock: dte/dte = 1
>        rate w.r.t M-clock: dte/dtm = 1
>    Tick/tock on clock at rest in M:
>        rate w.r.t E-clock: dtm/dte = 1
>        rate w.r.t M-clock: dtm/dtm = 1
> 
> 2) after M is set in motion:
>    Tick/tock on clock at rest in E:
>        rate w.r.t E-clock: dte/dte = 1
>        rate w.r.t M-clock: dte/dtm = 1/gamma    (was 1 before)
>    Tick/tock on clock at rest in M:
>        rate w.r.t E-clock: dtm/dte = 1/gamma    (was 1 before)
>        rate w.r.t M-clock: dtm/dtm = 1
> 
> Condensing these 8 quantities into 4 variables is called fumbling,
> or cheating, and in "Allyou!r" case, probably both.
> 
> Dirk Vdm

Creating new variables where there is no need, is called cheating, or
maybe just stupidity.

But let me humor this idiot.  Justify those extra variables, without
prematurely invoking the same conclusion you want to prove.

Be careful of the premature part.  That has always been your waterloo.