An immortal fumble by Androcles (Hexenmeister) (15-Apr-2006)
XOR revisited
"YBM" <ybmess@nooos.fr> wrote in message news:4440de82$0$30083$636a55ce@news.free.fr... | Hexenmeister a icrit : | > "YBM" <ybmess@nooos.fr> wrote in message news:4440d0bf$0$30088$636a55ce@news.free.fr... | ... | > | so it is not true that ( A xor B ) => (A or B) ? | > | > | > No, it is not true. | > (0 xor 0) =1 does not imply (0 or 0) = 1 because it doesn't. | > | > In case you didn't notice, shithead, 0 does not equal 1. | | In case you didn't notice, genious, => is not <=>, just like | 'included in' is not = for sets, and < is not = for-numbers. Hey moron, xor is a binary operator, you stupid cunt, just like +, -, * and / are binary operators. They don't "imply" at all. | Even worse, are you pretending that (False xor False) is True ?? Hey shithead, NOT FALSE = TRUE in Boolean Algebra, so (NOT FALSE) AND (NOT FALSE) = TRUE, haemorrhoid. Even worse, you are an arsehole as well as a cunt, and stupid enough to pay attention to anything Van de merde says. | What's really funny with you, dumby, is that one cannot never | assume any top level for you ignorance or stupidity, you always | figure out how to be worse... That's you, flea. Everyone around here that has encountered you refers to you as "Your Basic Moron". It seems you even dumber than Van de merde, although I didn't think that was possible. Even I can be wrong sometimes. | | > https://home.deds.nl/~dvdm/dirk/Stuff/AxorB.gif | > Even the dumbest idiot can see blue does not imply white, but | > you are fucking dumber than dumb. | | irrelevant and stupid comment : you've been caught as an | ignorant of elementary logic and/or an hypocrite Fucking idiot. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/XOR.html Fuck off, come back when you've grown up to be a full sized dog. Androcles. |
|
| Fumble Index | Original post & context: 6D60g.60500$8Q3.566@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk |
|
See also |
|