"Brian Kennelly" <bwkennelly@cox.net> wrote in message 
news:r7p0h.5255$%l3.1408@newsfe13.phx...
| Androcles wrote:
| > C'mon, local village dog tord, give me another fumble for
| >   http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/XorOr.gif )


| > "xor" implies "and", I've got all three lights on.  Right, Dork Van de
| > psycho?
|
| That one is almost too easy.  Your circuit is giving NOT XOR,
| you need to cross the wires between the switches.

Well done.
"xor implies or" -- Dork Van de psycho.
Hence:
[1 xor 1]  implies [1 or 1]
therefore  0 implies 1

Who is the shithead?
Androcles

 See also

https://home.deds.nl/~dvdm/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Gibberish.html

https://home.deds.nl/~dvdm/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORrevisited.html

https://home.deds.nl/~dvdm/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORContinued.html

https://home.deds.nl/~dvdm/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/LooksBoolean.html

https://home.deds.nl/~dvdm/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XOROnceMore.html

https://home.deds.nl/~dvdm/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORpersistence.html

https://home.deds.nl/~dvdm/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORWildStab.html