Home Is Where The Wind Blows

An immortal fumble by dwhig265 (5-Nov-2008)

The logic of the "dwh" as "mathematical symbol desinnating light speed percentage"
On Nov 4, 3:11 pm, John Polasek <jpola...@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 06:36:45 -0800 (PST), dwhig...@peoplepc.com wrote:
>> On Nov 3, 10:51 pm, John Polasek <jpola...@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 10:31:40 -0800 (PST), dwhig...@peoplepc.com wrote:
>>>> CONCLUSIONS REGARDING IaSNe OBSERVATIONS
>>>> by Dwain W. Higginbotham 3 Nov 2008
> 
>>>> Ia type supernovae are the best “standard candles” ever discovered.
>>>> When a IaSne explodes in a non red-shifted environment, it reaches
>>>> maximum brightness in 21 Earth days. This is called the rise time of
>>>> the light curve. When a IaSNe occurs in a red-shifted galaxy, you can
>>>> tell how fast it is moving, relative to us, by how long its’ rise time
>>>> appears to take to reach maximum brightness. By the science of simple
>>>> optics, the rise time, from our vantage point, increases exactly by
>>>> the same percentage of the speed of light that it is moving away from
>>>> us up to 120% which is about the maximum for resolving IaSNe.
> 
> Could you put your 'simple optics' in the form of an equation so we
> can all check it out? Apparently 42.6 = (1+120%)*21 days. Where is the
> logic?

DWH says: There is apparently no mathematical symbol desinnating light
speed percentages so I have devised one, modestly using my lower case
initials. A (dwh) of.1 = 10 percent of the speed of light and so on up
to a (dwh) of 1.0 = 100% light speed, 1.1 = 110% etc. The equation I
use for determining rise time is (1 + (dwh) x 21) = rise time in Earth
days!
 Fumble Index  Original post & context:
 713c817f-4bb0-4ced-b1c2-6de633f62804@g17g2000prg.googlegroups.com