> > As Luc Bourhis has pointed out, nothing that contradicts SR can get > > published in a peer-reviewed journal. > > > > So says greywoofie, as the dishnonesty oozes out of his pores. > > What Luc _actually_ said: > > "No peer-reviewed scientific publication would accept > my paper discussing Aether theories. Why ? Because I > would not be able to say something original about it. > Hundreds of papers have already discussed every > interesting details of the problem." Yep. Q.E.D. No theory or experiemental paper contradicting SR will be accepted by a peer-reviewed journal. |
|
Fumble Index | Original post & context: v9lps4lg9pn0e3@corp.supernews.com |
See also |
|