On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 23:11:40 +0100, "Dirk Van de moortel"
<dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> wrote:

> Henry Wilson DSc. <..@..> wrote in message
>  k1vkl7hnujcvpej6lfv47s69bgfa7foh88@4ax.com
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > Paul, when SR assumes that each observer is at rest in his own
> > personal aether, which it does for EVERY observer, naturally it
> > will produce the same answers as LET, using the same maths.
> > 
> > My example was perfectly sound. You used circular maths and
> > reasoning to try to show that SR gave the same prediction.
> > 
> > SR breaks down when it tries to provide a PHYSICAL explanation as
> > to why light speed should be the same for all observers. SR is
> > based on the bogus RoS and is obvious nonsense.
> 
> The PHYSICAL explanation as to why light speed should be the same
> for all observers, is that every PHYSICAL experiment shows that it does.
> The IDIOT explanation as to why light speed should NOT be the same
> for all observers, is that no IDIOT has the brains to understand PHYSICS.

HAHAHAHHHAHHAHHHAHHA!

WHAT AN IDIOT!

THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A OWLS EXPERIMENT FROM A MOVING SOURCE.