>>>>>> Hey idiot I am talking about the radio source and the receiver are at >>>>>> rest wrt each other. >>>>>> Both the source and the detector are at rest wrt each other so the >>>>>> wavelength arriving at the detector is the source wavelength. >>>>> >>>>> No, Seto, you fucking idiot, the source is not at rest with respect to >>>>> the detector. The frequency does not shift for distant objects at rest >>>>> with respect to the detector. It shifts for distant objects IN MOTION >>>>> relative to the detector. You are a complete fucking idiot. >>>> >>>> If you are far enough from the radio source the signal will break up >>>> and this is the result that the receiver is receiving less frequency. >>>> Gee you are stupid. >>> >>> Oh my God, Seto! You are really that much of a bonehead? >>> When you get are far away enough from a radio transmitter that the >>> signal begins to fade, the frequency doesn't change! Are you a complete >>> fucking idiot? >> >> So what do you think that causes the signal to fad? > > Drop in intensity to the point where the signal-to-noise ratio is less > than one! IDIOT! > > Frequency doesn't drop! Intensity does! Idiot, idiot, idiot! > Read your fucking freshman textbook! So you think that less waves per unit area per second is not drop in frequency? You are an idiot. |
|
Fumble Index | Original post & context: 6dbe1e49-afa8-47fb-b0f4-48673ca9826b@googlegroups.com |