On Thursday, July 31, 2014 3:35:14 AM UTC+8, Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
> Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 11:14:26 PM UTC+8, Dirk Van de moortel
>> wrote:
> 
>>> I hadn't even looked at what he was calculating.
>>> And it turns out that in stead of
>>>     L / sqrt( 1 - v^2/c^2 ).
>>> he had calculated
>>>     sqrt( 1 + v^2/c^2 ) / L
>>> which indeed--sort of--corresponds to
>>>     1/5.6E-15m/1/SQRT(1+294000000^2/300000000^2)> 
>>> 
>>> Dirk Vdm 
 
>> Dirk, I did not use the gamma formula used to measure a perceived
>> length contraction. I used the reciprocal to find the real size from
>> the contracted value measured by a non-comoving observer. What in
>> your opinion is the correct formula to get from the measurement of an
>> observed contracted length to the real length if I am wrong?

> Open your stupid eyes and read.
> You are too stupid for this. I'm not going to bother explaining.
> 
> Dirk Vdm

Dirk, your L / sqrt( 1 - v^2/c^2 ) is incorrect.
My sqrt( 1 + v^2/c^2 ) / L is correct and corresponds to
   1/5.6E-15m/1/SQRT(1+294000000^2/300000000^2)
   = 250,025,508,902km. This is the size of the electron
in its own frame (maybe in a world of illusion).

Peter Riedt