Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message
news:c9ka2a$1c6$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de...
> greywolf42 wrote:
> > Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message
> > news:c9hrfm$pnd$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de...

{snip higher levels}

> >>
> >>Show the calculation, please.
> >
> > Read the reference or not.  Your choice.
>
> Which reference?
>
> As I told you, I don't have the book availabe - and the post to
> which you gave a link did not contain calculations.

I don't care if you don't wish to make the effort (either physically or
monetarily).  It's an imperfect world.  Deal with it, troll.

{snip higher levels}
> >>
> >>Could you outline it for me, please?
> >
> > Not for a troll.
>
> Oh, someone who asks genuine questions is a "troll" for you?

Nope.  But your questions aren't genuine.  I gave you a reference, and you
won't read it.  I gave you specific answers on stability, and you divert
into tangential quesitions about how many photons are emitted and the
Stern-Gerlach experiment.  That's trolling.

{snip higher levels}

> >>When you talk about radii here, do you mean the radii of the orbits of
> >>the charges or the distances to the revolving charges?
> >
> > Huh?
>
> What did you not understand in the question above???

Pathetic troll.

> >>My argument was that the phase between E and H depends on the distance
> >>to the revolving charges. So why is it relevant that there are certain
> >>distances where the fields are in phase quadrature? At other distances,
> >>they aren't.
> >
> > That's the point, troll.
>
> The point was supposed to be that for certain radii, revolving charges
> don't radiate because the E and H fields are in phase quadrature.

Yep.

> That
> point breaks down when one considers that the phase between the E and H
> field depends on the distance to the revolving charges, and hence they
> can be in phase quadrature only at certain distances, not at all.

Why *do* you repeat yourself?

> How
> does one get from "at certain distances, E and H are in phase
> quadrature" to "the revolving charges do not radiate"???

Think, troll.

> And please stop calling me a troll. These are *genuine* questions which
> I would like to have answered!

Bye, troll.  Read the reference or not.  Your choice.

{snip the rest}

--
greywolf42
ubi dubium ibi libertas
{remove planet for return e-mail}