> And I will repeat for the final time: > Is 0.5 seconds = 0.5 Hz? [Q5] > YES OR NO? By the only clock that is ticking, yes. > > If you say NO to [Q5], and you do not take down the webpage, as you > promised, then I will know that you are a liar, and a belligerent one > at that. Cut out your fucking bullshit. I've said yes, by the only clock that is ticking. I don't care if it ticks once a solar day, sidereal day, lunar month or calendar year, it will still only advance 0.5 second by its own reading between "tick" and "tock". The page stays. Draw up your "Basic series proposed" and put a reference to my page in it, you imbecile. [Remainder snipped, unread] Androcles. |
|
Fumble Index | Original post & context: rLuKd.9784$n9.8694@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk |