My model rejects the current physics explanations about light by
claiming that the ether is in space as Dark Matter particles and is
invisible to us because it has negative matter and energy.  When light
is initially created, it is only energy which is also invsible to us
just like gravitation.  We see its effects, but not it.  Immediately,
the heat energy interacts with the particles of DM and transmits some
of its energy to them such that they obtain positive mass and energy,
and become visible to us as a photon, or quanta, of light.

>
> It is so ridiculous that the idiots of relativity deliberately
> obfuscate straightforward logical facts to promote their status to
> _wizards_ of OZ to give the wrong impression that they are far above
> laymen that can never understand what they say, but basically because
> what they say is littered with contradictions and merry-go-round
> circular logic.
>

I could not agree with you more.

>
> The title's question was pointing a finger to an unsettling
> contradiction in Relativity and what it claims.
>

El, the only way to settle the silliness of current physics is by us
laypersons doing what you and I are doing in this conversation.  That
way, others will learn to question the idiots who defend the physics
fairyland which to us is no more than a bunch of naked emperors
parading in the streets.