On Sep 10, 10:08 am, "Dirk Van de moortel"
<dirkvandemoor...@nospAm.hotmail.com> wrote:
> strich....@gmail.com <strich....@gmail.com> wrote in message
> 
> f809a61f-7be7-4672-b503-9ddddf329...@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com
> 
>> On Sep 10, 9:36 am, "Dirk Van de moortel"
>> <dirkvandemoor...@nospAm.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> strich....@gmail.com <strich....@gmail.com> wrote in message
> 
>>> fcf830ab-053b-4a95-9530-62b12caae...@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com
> 
>>>> On Sep 9, 3:16 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel"
>>>> <dirkvandemoor...@nospAm.hotmail.com> wrote:

>>>>> strich.999@gmail.com <strich.999@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>  48ad57b8-5e87-4cdc-b199-d138068274a4@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com

>>>>>> Let me see...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Granted, the clock is faster in the satellite by 46us per day than on
>>>>>> the ground, after about 1.88 billion years, the clock higher up will
>>>>>> be ahead by one year than on the ground. Thus, in that futuristic
>>>>>> time, if the year on the ground was 2 billion and 8, then the year on
>>>>>> the satellite is 2 billion and 9. Anything wrong with that picture?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That means the satellite has revolved around the sun ahead by one
>>>>>> revolution!
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, it would, IF the satellite would carry its OWN PRIVATE
>>>>> sun-earth system with it, to count ITS OWN PRIVATE years
>>>>> and revolutions - i.o.w. its OWN PRIVATE (Spaceman-
>>>>> malfunctioning) CLOCK.
> 
>>>> Another argument from the arse. Let me see, the earth has its own
>>>> "private" sun-earth system. The satellite has to borrow this
>>>> privileged or special frame as it does not have its own "private"
>>>> system.
> 
>>> If you compare time as measured on Earth with time as measured
>>> on the satellite, you have to use a clock tied to the satellite and a
>>> clock tied to the earth. If you use the earth-sun system for the
>>> latter to count years, you cannot use that same system for the
>>> former, which is precisely what you did, infinite imbecile.
> 
>> And why not you clueless idiot?
> 
>> Let me put it this way.
> 
> Ha!
> It's goint to put it another way :-)
> 
>> If you claim time runs faster in the
>> satellite, then in its frame, everything runs faster, and that
>> includes everything, from radioactive decay, to aging, to orbits
>> around the sun.
> 
> No, imbecile, the sun is reference for the earth ground system.
> Your 'everything' includes orbits of the satellite's hypothetical
> PRIVATE earth orbiting around its PRIVATE sun, both
> hypothetically travelling WITH the satellite, in order to record
> its PRIVATE 'years'.
> Good grief, give it up - you are apparently too stupid for this :-)
> 
> Dirk Vdm

"Private".  Is that terminology from Einstein, or did you make it up
to support your distorted understanding of physics?

And you have the nerve to capitalize this invented terminology.

The nerve...   The nerd...  Unfortunately, a stupid nerd.