> The anomalous precession is perfectly explained by GR. There is > no "wiggle room" in GR, no adjustable parameters. Yet Mercury, > Venus, the Earth, and Mars all show anomalous precessions > which, to the limit of measurement accuracy, agree with the GR > prediction. Crap. How could a circular maths theory cause anything physical? There HAS to be a Newtonian explanation. > In the case of Mars, the presence of the two Viking landers allowed > monitoring of the Mars orbit to an accuracy of better than 10 meters > between 1976 though 1982. Even at this extreme accuracy, there is > no significant disagreement between the orbital precession of Mars > and the GR prediction. That's why those two capsules crashed I suppose. You have all the religious conviction of a suicide bomber. Einsteiniana might call for volunteers soon... |
|
Fumble Index | Original post & context: gn4e52lkr5tptldcd6ui8hran19vpqc0q6@4ax.com |