Bill Hobba wrote:
> > It would be much easier for you to understand if you read the theory.
> > I present the link to the white paper, here, for your convenience:
> > http://www.16pi2.com/files/NewFoundationPhysics.pdf
>
> Dave I have read your rubbish before - it is just that - rubbish.

Bill, I have read your unsubstantiated and mindless rants before, and
they are just that, unsubstantiated and mindless rants.

> >> What stopped it?  And
> >> why did you need to flick the paper to get it to align with the field?
> >
> > As for the iron filings with zero net magnetic alignment after the
> > strong magnetic field is removed, the force of gravity, the unit of
> > friction, and the strong force binding the paper
>
> The strong force????????????.

Yes, the paper molecules are bound together by the Van der Waals
forces, which is another form of the strong force.  The atoms of the
molecules are bound together directly by the strong force between
subatomic particles.  If the strong force were not present, the paper
would not have its present form.

> The strong force is basically a residual
> color force - ever hear of confinement?

I guess you haven't got much of a clue what the strong force is.  That
comes from believing the rubbish of "color forces" mediated by
imaginary "gluons" and "pions."

My theory actually quantifies the strong force using simple Newtonian
type force laws, which are fully related to the other force laws.
Taken together, all the force laws in my physics produce a
mathematically correct and practical Unified Force Theory.  Your
rubbish doesn't even have a Unified Force Theory, practical or not!

> I gave you two options - yet you
> chose one straight from left field.  It is caused by the friction between
> the filings and paper caused by gravity.

That is exactly what I said.  Close your mouth and open your eyes for a
moment.

> Reading the rubbish above I strongly suspect you have some kind of disorder
> that causes you to simply make stuff up and somehow it becomes truth in your
> mind.

I can assure you the mental deficiency is on your end.  I can back up
my quantification for the strong force with data and mathematics.
Further, I can clearly see that paper is held together by the strong
force (as well as the electrostatic force), whereas you can't.

Dave