Home Is Where The Wind Blows

An immortal fumble by Androcles (Hexenmeister) (23-Jan-2006)

Why Androcles should see a doctor.
"JanPB" <filmart@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:1138003991.488432.326900@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Hexenmeister wrote:
> "JanPB" <filmart@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>  news:1137988289.217232.29320@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > Hexenmeister wrote:
> > > "JanPB" <filmart@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:1137965307.041984.227240@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> > > > Hexenmeister wrote:
> > > >> "Sue..."  wrote in message 
> > > >> news:1137937364.893739.177480@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > Although transformation to the Lorenz gauge hides 
> > > >> > the problems with sign and magnitude, the absurdity of 
> > > >> > short range (1/r^3) B fields in the absence 
> > > >> > of a charge remains. 
> > > >> > 
> > > >>
> > > >> Who is "Lorenz" ?
> > > >
> > > > Ludvig Valentin Lorenz (1829-1891), Danish physicist, the inventor of
> > > > the retarded potential and a handy constraint relating magnetic and
> > > > electric potentials known as the Lorenz gauge.
> > > >
> > > > The latter is commonly misattributed in English language texs to one
> > > > Hendrik Antoon Lorentz (1853-1928), Dutch physicist, who was only 13
> > > > years old when L. V. Lorenz published his "gauge" paper (in English, no
> > > > less, which was rare in those days - go figure).
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jan Bielawski
> > >
> > > So who is Bielawski?
> > > You are still a snipping, arrogant, illiterate, innumerate, illogical,
> > > cunt without a scrap of logic in you, you whining little toad.
> > > You don't have an inkling about mathematics or physics
> > > and live in the vain hope some moron will think you are clever,
> > > Mr SmartArse who pretends he understands relativity and
> > > doesn't have a clue how to synchronize his watch to Cassini
> > > time.
> > > Modern physics:
> > >  http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Synchronize/Synchronize.htm
> > >
> > > Hey dumbfuck! Do you know how to move sideways or up?
> > > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/how_to3.jpg
> > >
> > > tau = (t-vx/c²)/sqrt(1-v²/c²)
> > > tau = (t-uy/c²)/sqrt(1-u²/c²)
> > > tau = (t-wz/c²)/sqrt(1-w²/c²)
> > > xi  = (x-vt)/sqrt(1-v²/c²)
> > > eta = (y-ut)/sqrt(1-u²/c²)
> > > zeta= (z-wt)/sqrt(1-w²/c²)
> > >
> > > Right or wrong, dumbfuck?
> > > If one is right they all are, if one is wrong they all are,
> > > pathetic shithead.
> > >
> > > Einstein said
> > > eta = y,
> > > zeta = z
> > > because he did not know how to move sideways or up,
> > > anencephalous cretin.
> > >
> > >
> > > [quote]
> > > we establish by definition that the "time" required by a crab to travel
> > >  from A to B equals the "time" it requires to travel from B to A.
> > > [end quote]
> > > Ref: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
> > >
> > > Einstein can prove nothing can go faster than a crab.
> > >
> > > Oops!... Did I say 'a crab'? Sorry...'light'.
> > >
> > >
> > > "In agreement with experience we further assume the quantity
> > > 2AB/(t'A-tA) = c,
> > > to be a universal constant--the velocity of light in empty space." --
> > > Einstein.
> > >
> > > In agreement with experience and without any assumption,
> > > BA = -AB,
> > > 2AB = AC,
> > >
> > > [AB +BA]/(t'A-tA) = 0
> > > Hence c = 0 in Einstein's math.
> > >
> > > Observation:
> > > http://www.britastro.org/vss/gifc/00918-ck.gif
> > > Explanation:
> > > http://www.ebicom.net/~rsf1/sekerin.htm (fig 3)
> > >
> > > (Or stars explode twice in three months, which is stupid).
> > >
> > > In agreement with experience and without any assumption,
> > > you remain a snipping, arrogant, illiterate, innumerate, illogical,
> > > incompetent cunt without a scrap of logic in you,
> > > you whining little toad.
> > > You don't have an inkling about mathematics or physics
> > > and live in the vain hope some moron will think you are clever,
> > > Mr SmartArse who pretends he understands physics and
> > > doesn't have a clue how to synchronize his watch to Cassini
> > > time.
> > > Modern physics:
> > >  http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Synchronize/Synchronize.htm
> > >
> > > Fuck off, useless tord!
> > >
> > >
> > > tau = (t-vx/c²)/sqrt(1-v²/c²)
> > > tau = (t-uy/c²)/sqrt(1-u²/c²)
> > > tau = (t-wz/c²)/sqrt(1-w²/c²)
> > > xi  = (x-vt)/sqrt(1-v²/c²)
> > > eta = (y-ut)/sqrt(1-u²/c²)
> > > zeta= (z-wt)/sqrt(1-w²/c²)
> > > If one is right they all are, if one is wrong they all are.
> > > Carry three watches or do not move sideways or ride an elevator.
> > >
> > > Personally I prefer three witches:
> > > Double double, toil and trouble,
> > > Fire burn and Einstein bubble.  --- Pop!
> > > Hexenmeister.
> > 
> > I think you ought to see a doctor.
> > 
> > --
> > Jan Bielawski
> > 
> > You?  Think?  YOU?
> > Hahahaha!
> > Robert Winn has more intelligence than you, and he's a welder.
> > > If you take a set of coordinates, a photon traveling in the +x 
> > > direction has a velocity of c=186,000 miles per second relative to the 
> > > set of coordinates.  A photon traveling in the -x direction has a 
> > > velocity of -c= -186,000 miles per second.  Since -186,000 does not 
> > > equal +186,000 we have just proven that the velocity of light is not a 
> > > constant.  What does seem to be a constant is the ability of scientists 
> > > to believe that -186,000 = +186,000.  I hope that this will help you. 
> > > Robert B. Winn
> > Should he see a doctor too?
> > Hexenmeister.
> > 
> > 
> 
> At a distance there seem to be a pathology here. Any normal person in
> your shoes would realise very quickly (within days or weeks tops) *what
> it is they don't know*. This prevents them from wasting time on
> chimeras - they either turn to something more interesting or they
> decide to learn that which they know they don't know. You don't seem to
> know what you don't know. I find it very peculiar.
> 
> If you want to criticise something, you must learn it first. This is
> just honesty. Since you don't understand relativity, you shouldn't
> criticise it, you look like a fool when you do. Learn it first, see its
> weak points *as they really are*. There is no other way.
> 
> --
> Jan Bielawski

Answer the question, Bilewacky.
Oh wait. You don't know what a question is...
See a psychiatrist.
Hexenmeister. 
 Fumble Index

 Original posts & context:
K31Bf.6290$mu.2730@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk

zo_Af.6137$mu.183@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk