>  the relative velocity between two moving entities do not
> have the same value when you make the measurements in different
> frames.

Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference.

[snip]

Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.

[snip]

You are confused, not me.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.

[snip]

So it is not ambiguous, then.
In the k-frame, the velocity of light is c.
In the K-frame, the velocity of light is c-v.
So we are done. The velocity of light is NOT c in ALL frames of reference,
Einstein has said so, unambiguously and in the correct context.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.

[snip]

Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.

[snip]

Sure.
YOU said the velocity of light was c in all frames of reference.
Einstein said the velocity of light is c-v in the K-frame.
*I* say Einstein did not use his own composition of velocities to make YOUR
statement correct.
Done.
So I am right as I have been all along,  you (and Einstein) are wrong.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.
Repeating once again,
The velocity of light is c in k and c-v in K. Einstein has said so.
So it is not c in ALL frames of reference as you originally claimed.

I stand by my web page.
DONE.
Androcles