Marcel Luttgens <mluttgens@club-internet.fr> wrote in message
news:243a1189.0204042335.5d803019@posting.google.com...
> More evidence against the Big Bang
> __________________________________
>
> According to the interesting article below,
>
> "Some astronomers are seeing evidence that the first generation of
> stars
> and galaxies appeared just a few hundred million years after the start
> of the universe.
> Star formation in that early period could have occurred at a rate
> about
> ten times as fast as in the present-day universe."
>
> But why were stars and galaxies created so quickly about 14 billion
> years ago?
> There is no scientific explanation for such phenomenon.
> Instead of believing in a Big Bang, thinking that the universe was
> created 14 billion
> years ago, it is much more sensible to believe that the universe is
> isotropic and
> homogeneous in space and time. In other words, galaxies were as
> numerous in the past
> as they are to-day. Contrary to the BB theory, this view is perfectly
> compatible with
> the latest astronomical observations.
>
> Marcel Luttgens

Of course, Marcel. reasonable people like yourself and I know that the
universe cannot be expanding, but most physicists really aren't reasonable.

H.Ellis Ensle