"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<ejbPd.9460$Fi6.558138@phobos.telenet-ops.be>...
> "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message news:9LaPd.87849$K7.67388@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> >
> 
> [snip]
> 
> >
> > My statement is clear enough.
> > How anyone could claim
> >  [ something, in this case it happens to be V = (u+v)/ ( 1 + uv/c^2)]
> > is baffling to say the least.
> 
> Androcles is one of those top-class experimentalists who
> has done an experiment where a velocity of 1 m/s was
> combined with a velocity of 1 m/s and it gave exactly
> 2.00000000000000000 m/s as opposed to the
> 1.99999999999999998 m/s that is predicted by the theory.
> Together with Jim Greenfield, Vertner Vergon, John
> Polasek, and Mike (aka Bill Smith aka Undeniable aka
> Eleatis) he will be nominated for the Nobel-prize next
> year.
> 
> Dirk Vdm

I know that you are unable/willing to answer this,
but what IS the value of c^2   when c is 300,000 km/sec (for
convienience)
If YOU can arrive at a result other than 90,000,000,000 km/sec, the
Prize is yours, for pointing out that every calculation ever made by
squaring a number, is incorrect!

....and note DV _carefully_ says "predicted by the theory"  (not
"measured")

Jim G
c'=c+v