On Jun 11, 2:10 pm, "Greg Neill" <gneill...@OVEsympatico.ca> wrote:
> <kens...@erinet.com> wrote in message
> 
> news:d6390029-ac25-4204-8057-e274cdae7b00@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com
> 
> 
> 
>>>> Fucking idiot....I already know what a preferred frame is.
> 
> Apparently not.
> 
>> OK idiot what are those unique properties???
>> For the last time:
>> 1. The PoR says that all inertial frames are equivalent....including
>> the preferred frame.
> 
> Nope. That's your first error. You have added the the
> bit, "including the preferred frame."

Can you tell me what are the unique properties of a preferred frame
that is different than an inertial frame?

> Since the principle
> of relativity specifically banishes the existance of a
> preferred frame, you can't just tack it back in on a whim
> and think everything is fine. YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT A
> PREFERRED FRAME IS.

I can be convinced that I am wrong if you can tell me what unique
properties the preferred frame has that the inertial frame doesn't
have. Without that you are just making bull shit statements.

Ken Seto