George Dishman <george@briar.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ctiap2$fe7$1@news.freedom2surf.net...
>
> "jacob navia" <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> wrote in message
> news:41fc2bd7$0$10464$8fcfb975@news.wanadoo.fr...
> > greywolf42 wrote:
> >> The COBE resolution is 1 part in
> >> 10,000 at any given intensity.  But the absolute value of the reported
> >> results are 1 part in 100,000 from the background blackbody curve.
> >
> > The "wrinkles in the face of god" aren't real then?
> > :-)
> >
> > Seems quite interesting to me. It was all very difficult to swallow
> > anyway.
> >
> > They *had* to find some irregularities since otherwise all
> > the theory went down the toilet...
>
> WMAP found the same wrinkles at the same place but
> with better detail.

Which would be expected, if they use the same convolution equations.

> All greywolf can suggest is some
> grandiose conspiracy theory in which they used the
> COBE results to doctor the noise in WMAP.

What a pathetic lie.  I never made any such assertion.

--
greywolf42
ubi dubium ibi libertas
{remove planet for return e-mail}