On 15 Mar, 10:25, Jonas Thornvall j...@tele2.se wrote:
> On 15 Mar, 01:53, Jonas Thornvall j...@tele2.se wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Make a flashlight travelling inside a ship in relativistic velocity
> > 'back to front' reach the front very slow, and light travelling
> > 'front to back' very fast.
>
> > The light will not have symetric lightpaths lengths per time unit
> > within the ship, if switched on simultaneous they will not hit
> > respective flashlight at other side of ship, at same place in the
> > inertial frame of restpace they fly thru.
>
> > Maybe something to think of for the worshippers of inertial
> > lightspeed, an expanding lightsphere puls sent out around a ship
> > passing thru an inertial frame of  a solar system will not expand
> > symetric around the ship. According to relativity it will expand
> > symetric around the 'drop place' or if you will the inertial space
> > place where the emission of puls took place.
>
> > So does the light travel different within the ship then outside the
> > ship, i would think not.
> > You cannot let the light expand symmetrical within the ship and
> > unsymmetrical outside the ship but then again maybe you can you are
> > relativists muahahahahhdhhaha
>
> > Ok i understand that you both want to eat the cookie symmetric shaped
> > inside the belly were noone sees it, but want it to have unsymmetric
> > properties outside the belly were it is public.
>
> > No harm you are relativists after all you fucked up the meter already
> > 1980 i mean who the fuck care if you give it some extra properties
> > for outside and inside measurements.
>
> > *RELATIVISIC T/-SHIRT TEMAS'
> > 'I am a proud relativist i've been bending time and space since 1905'
>
> > 'I am a proud relativist we did give that fucking meter a pretty hard
> > blow 1980, invariant light since and frame dependent meters that is
> > what turn me on'
>
> > 'I am a proud relativist i've been BANGIN up space since 1905 and I
> > have no plans to stop'
>
> > 'I am a proud relativist i've let gas expand symmetric in my belly
> > since 1905, but still expanding unsymetric when farting at
> > relativistic speeds'
>
> > 'I am a proud relativist my 'c' ship is going nowhere in the inertial
> > frame since 1905, fuck space fuck time fuck distances i like to
> > travel
> > anyway'
>
> > 'I am a proud relativist i have a certificate to plot space anyway i
> > feel the Lorentz transformation require since 1905, yeah so what if
> > you throw a jellyfish thru air it look like spacetime no big deal'
>
> > Best regards Jonas Thornvall.
>
> ONLY AN IDIOT WOULD SEE NO PROBLEM WITH TWO SIMULTANEOUS SENT SIGNALS
> WITHIN THE SHIP REACHING THE SHIPS FRONT AND BACK AT DIFFERENT PLACES
> IN SPACE.
>
> ONLY AN IDIOT WOULD THINK THAT THE LIGHBEAMS WILL STILL HOWEVER REACH
> EACH END AND FRONT OF THE SHIP AT THE SAME TIME WITHIN THE SHIP.
>
> ONLY AN IDIOT WOULD BELEIVE THAT USING THE LORENTZ TRANSFORM IT WILL
> MAKE PEOPLE WALKING FRONT AND BACK, BACK TO FRONT, TAKE THE SAME TIME
> AND THAT THEY WILL REACH EACH END AT SAME MOMENT.
>

Oooops
 THE TRUTH IS THAT THE FUCKER WALKING TOWARDS THE FRONT NOT WILL HAVE
 STARTED TAKING HIS FIRST STEP, WHEN THE FUCKER WALKING TOWARDS THE
 ****BACK**** REACH THE ***END*** OF THE SHIP.
>
> AND THIS IS AS 'OBSERVED' BY THE STOOPID SHITHEAD RELATIVISTS LIVING
> AT ALPHA CENTAURI WHEN THE SHIP STOPS, AND THEY ARE FUCKING STUMPED.
>
> UNFORTUNATLY IT WAS A ONEWAY TRIP AND THE STUPID RELATIVISTS AT EARTH
> ARE STILL CLUELESS.
>
> You are a moron Bill a 10 year old can see that the lightbeams will
> reach the flashlighs at different places in the inertial frame of the
> space AKA 'different moments'.
> A 5 year old can draw the conclusion that the Lorentz transforms of
> time and meters is vector dependent along the travelling path. AKA
> meters expand in the negative direction of the lorentz transform and
> contract in the positive direction of the Lorentz transform.
>
> JT- Dölj citerad text -
>
> - Visa citerad text -