In article <4e64cbd1$0$29986$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>, 
> relatively@rest.com says...
> 
> "Byron Forbes"  wrote in message
> news:MPG.28cf72a82962540e98990b@news.tpg.com.au...
>> 
>> But no matter - we simply make it the oscillation of an atom, spring,
>> whatever.
>> .
>> TD is still flushed.
> 
> Why do you think relativistic Doppler effect means relativistic time
> dilation is wrong .. when both are predicted by SR?  You clearly cannot
> think .. did you have problems with putting Lego blocks together as a child?


It sounds like you suffer from the dopler effect.

Since you are a fraud and have snipped what you don't like,
I will remind you that my example had a point traveling
directly at us i.e. no Doppler, idiot.

You are an unashamed fan boy without a clue.