Btw, one should try to be logical. You wrote:
"Suppose that in the frame of the Earth, the following
sequence of events happen:
e1: A rocket passes by the Earth at velocity v (as
measured in the Earth frame). The Earth-coordinates
for this event are x1=0, t1=0.
Now let's look at the same events from the point of view of
the rocket:
e1: The Earth passes the rocket at velocity -v, as
measured in the rocket frame. The rocket-coordinates
for this event are x1' = 0, t1' = 0.
So our transformation equations are:
(assuming that
x' = A x + B t
t' = C x + D t)
(1) x' = A (x-vt)
(2) t' = A (t-vx/c^2)"
According to your premises, when x1 = 0 and t1 = 0, x1' = 0 and t1' = 0,
or vice versa.
Or, from relation (2), i.e. t1' = A (t1-vx1/c^2), one also gets t1' = 0
when t1 = vx1/c^2. This contradicts you premises, and proves that your
transformation equations cannot be linear.
Don't be a moron like me (cf. feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de)!
Marcel Luttgens
|
|
Fumble Index | Original post & context: 86996cba.0504210511.52058344@posting.google.com |