"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:tcvjs1plu761krhodaiqdrvh8153mkfu0i@4ax.com...
> On 14 Jan 2006 08:42:25 -0800, "clujdej@yahoo.com" <clujdej@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
> >OK, so you are not as bad as the others. But your formulas are
> >"ad-hoc", i.e. they are not derived , they are simply "written down".
>
> What do you men 'not as bad as the others'?
>
> All Seto did was put the 'Einstein' back into aether theories.

Wrong....IRT is complete whereas SRT is not complete. IRT includes SRT as a
subset. However, the equaltions of IRT are valid in all
environments....including gravity.
BTW do you have an alternate theory for SRT that includes equations? I guess
not.:-)

> ..but of course you being a king crackpot probably agree that the MMX
> apparatus always moves vertically wrt all light.

You are an idiot. The vertical direction of absolute motion is the only
direction that will give the null results for all the orientations of the
horizontal arms. This is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments in
which they found that there is frequency shift in the vertical direction in
any location on earth..

Ken Seto