"Tom Roberts" <tjroberts@lucent.com> wrote in message 
news:drb8n9$d7c@netnews.net.lucent.com...
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>> Equations are laws; they are not theories.  A theory is an explanation.
>
> Not in modern sciance.

FUCK YOU VERY MUCH!



>
> Today, the notion of "physical laws" is considered archaic.

BULLSHITTING MORON!



> The term
> implies that nature somehow ordained such "laws", and we have come to 
> realize that we humans can never truly divine nature's intent. So we are 
> limited to making _models_ of natural phenomena, and we call these 
> "theories".
>
> In modern physics, theories are a set of mathematical equations, and an 
> interpretation of the symbols in them; together they provide a detailed 
> model of some class of physical phenomena.

FUCKIN' DROOL!


>
> So, for instance, we do not consider either GR or the
> standard model to be "physical laws", they are theories.

AHAHAHAHAHA!
GR isn't a phyical theory, it's a physical fairy tale!

>
>
> Often the ideas surrounding the interpretation


Roberts has a different meaning to INTERPRETATION just as
he does to OBSERVATION.

> of the equations will provide a "one level deep" explanation, but we

("we" is Roberts, Baez and Einstein, not any real physicists)


> also realize that no complete explanation is possible without truly 
> divining nature's plan,

(which was defined by Jehovah Holy Einstein)

   http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/how_to_be_as_smart_as_einstein.htm

> and we are reconciled to not being able to do that.
>
> In a very real sense this is the result of separation of church and 
> science.


In very real sense Roberts is a devout Einsteinian, as religious as can be.

 http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/GPS/sundials.htm
 http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Lucent/Roberts.htm
 http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Clockgain.JPG
 http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/RR_C7/RelativityRevealed.htm
Androcles.