On Dec 20, 4:34 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel"
<dirkvandemoor...@nospAm.hotmail.com> wrote:
> Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> b57c8be1-6ed4-444a-97cd-b78400631...@r37g2000prr.googlegroups.com
>
> > Consider the following arguments:
>
> > (1) It rains; therefore the soil is wet.
>
> Soil can be wet without rain.
> We call this an implication.

LOGICIANS call this an implication, Clever Moortel. Einstein zombies
(or Einstein dingleberries) just sing "Yes we all believe in
relativity, relativity, relativity":

"YES WE ALL BELIEVE IN RELATIVITY, RELATIVITY, RELATIVITY"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PkLLXhONvQ

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com 

> > (2) X=5; therefore X+3=8.
> 
> X+3=8 cannot be without X=5.
> We call this an equivalence.