> > There is no "clock sync" of the stationary system, you clown! > > Time in the stationary system (t) can *supposedly* be different to > > time in the moving system (tau), but it can't be different to itself! > > | Who says it's different than itself? > > This does: > tau(32,0,0,16) the time at the engine is 16 microseconds past > midnight. | According to the stationary clock at that spot. See what I mean? Infinitely stupid. I have no idea what stationary clock you are talking about or what spot you are talking about. But, one step at a time. Let's deal with the stationary spot first. That's 80, the engine moved from spot 32 at speed 3 for 16 time. 32+ 3*16 = 80. Does 80 appear in either equation? No. Did anyone put a stationary clock at 80? No. Is there a "stationary" clock on the engine? No; there is a clock that moves with the engine. What are the limits of Bile awski's stupidity? Infinite. Fuck off, cunt. Androcles. |
|
Fumble Index | Original post & context: yHbYe.4795$MD4.2584@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk |