"cnctut" <cnctutwiler@wmconnect.com> wrote in message 
news:1156293774.984694.92930@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| > "cnctut" <cnctutwiler@wmconnect.com> wrote in message
| > news:1156291270.396124.221840@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
| > | Sorcerer wrote:
| > | > "cnctut" <cnctutwiler@wmconnect.com> wrote in message
| > | > news:1156285492.142221.206310@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
| > | >
| > | > | Tut writes:
| > | > |
| > | > | I'm confused--I thought TP was a man--the subtitles indicate TP is a
| > | > | women--then a man--then a women etc. How many wigs and bra's does he
| > | > | own?
| > | > |
| > | > | Please, someone help? ;-))
| > | > |
| > | > | Tut
| > | > Fucking troll.
| > | >  Androcles
| > |
| > | Andy--
| > |
| > | What's your problem?--I cleanup your math--and now I have to cleanup
| > | your english. Shame on you--you should be grateful, don't you think?
| >
| > I'm not grateful at all. You ruined my gambit.
| >
| > "gambit" -- a chess opening in which a player risks one or more pawns
| > or a minor piece to gain an advantage in position.
| >
| > (1) x' = x-vt
| > (2) xi = x'/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
| > (3) xi-x' =  xi[1- 1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)]  --- gambit.
| > (4) x'-xi = -xi[1- 1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)]
| >
| > Of course I could not say it was a gambit, it was up to my opponent
| > to either take the bait or play his own move.
| >
| > I have a longstanding game with Phuckwit Duck and was offering
| > a piece in return for a better position.
| > Then a fucking moron tells the opposition what the move was,
| > snips like an idiot and refuses to carry my books because
| > he knows no mathematics and refuses to discuss the matter.
| > I tried to explain it to you, but now you can take your sour
| >  grapes and FUCK OFF, moron!
| > Androcles
|
| (none snipped---but some changed for the children)
|
| Androcles,
|
| I'm sorry I ruined your "gambit"--but I thought you challenged me or
| Dirk or PD

I did not challenge you.


| to show you your error--which I did, and nicely I thought.

Of course. It was a deliberare error and you found it.
I am not blaming you for that. My point is that
Dork Van de merde (merde is French for "faeces" and Dork
is Belgian, so delete that for the children, pompous prig)
repeatedly attempts to use xi = x', and "teach" relativity,
as does Phuckwit Duck. You have declared yourself
uninterested in mathematics and refuse to take it seriously,
hence I have no recourse but tell you to FUCK OFF!


| Remember, you brought me into the mess--so be a standup guy and get
| over it. I've shown no ill will toward you,  have I?


No,  you did not bring me into it. I have been struggling since
1999 to point out to these morons that Einstein was a huckster,
I brought myself into it.

Nor do I give a shit for your wishes, best or otherwise. Best
wishes and $2.00 will buy me a cup of coffee in Starbucks,
but without the $2.00 I won't get the coffee. With it and
without your best wishes I will.

Let me tell you something. I'm drunk. My daughter died 26/07/06,
three weeks ago, and I'm doing this to keep myself busy or I'll be
joining her prematurely.
  http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Wendy/Wendy.htm

I have grandchildren smarter than you but even they could wind
up indoctrinated, and so I must carry on as best I can.

Today I took them to Gatwick airport to "get away", my grandson
misses his mother terribly. He looked at the sky on the way and
saw a star. "That's mummy's star", he said.
"Not that one", I said, "I'll show you which one when the skies
are clearer."
I INSIST on truth, and I was the one that told him she had her own
 star, which she does because I have named her planet. You
are incapable of understanding that, you are a grinning ape.

Androcles

 See also

https://home.deds.nl/~dvdm/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Doofus.html