On 10/17/2012 2:36 PM, Big Dog wrote: > On 10/16/2012 8:58 AM, Uwe Hayek wrote: >> On 10/15/2012 5:20 PM, Big Dog wrote: >>> On 10/13/2012 9:14 AM, Alen wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Why should I see a problem? Because I am not >>>> blind or stupid. If we were both in spaceships in >>>> outer space then, given suitable conditions, >>>> according to the spacetime diagram, yesterday, >>>> your time, you moved through empty space, but >>>> today, your time, my space ship crashes into your >>>> yesterday space ship, which is impossible, since >>>> your past cannot be changed after it has already >>>> happened. Now why on earth would anybody see >>>> a crash yesterday, occurring today, which didn't >>>> happen yesterday, as a problem? Do I REALLY >>>> have to actually ANSWER that!?? >>>> >>>> Alen >>>> >>> >>> No, you cannot get that, and yet there is no absolute "now" either. >> >> There is nothing that indicates that. >> On the contrary, all the evidence points to an absolute now. > > What experimental evidence favors absolute time? Time does not equal Now. Or vice versa. |
|
Fumble Index | Original post & context: 507edfc2$0$6851$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl |