Home Is Where The Wind Blows

An immortal fumble by Uwe Hayek (17-Oct-2012)

Hayek's experimental evidence for absolute time
On 10/17/2012 2:36 PM, Big Dog wrote:
> On 10/16/2012 8:58 AM, Uwe Hayek wrote:
>> On 10/15/2012 5:20 PM, Big Dog wrote:
>>> On 10/13/2012 9:14 AM, Alen wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why should I see a problem? Because I am not
>>>> blind or stupid. If we were both in spaceships in
>>>> outer space then, given suitable conditions,
>>>> according to the spacetime diagram, yesterday,
>>>> your time, you moved through empty space, but
>>>> today, your time, my space ship crashes into your
>>>> yesterday space ship, which is impossible, since
>>>> your past cannot be changed after it has already
>>>> happened. Now why on earth would anybody see
>>>> a crash yesterday, occurring today, which didn't
>>>> happen yesterday, as a problem? Do I REALLY
>>>> have to actually ANSWER that!??
>>>>
>>>> Alen
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, you cannot get that, and yet there is no absolute "now" either.
>>
>> There is nothing that indicates that.
>> On the contrary, all the evidence points to an absolute now.
>
> What experimental evidence favors absolute time?

Time does not equal Now. Or vice versa.
 Fumble Index  Original post & context:
 507edfc2$0$6851$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl