| >               The Seven Deadly Sins of Special Relativity.

| Hint: the topic here was General Relativity.

Hint: SR is a subset of GR.
Hint: You are a fucking lying bullshitter.

|
| > For quotations following, reference:
| >  http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
| >  ("On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" by Albert Einstein)
| >
| > 1) "light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c
| > which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body",
| > a totally unproven assumption without any evidence to support it.

| Hint: no assumption in science is ever proven.

Hint: Scientists don't make assumptions. They study Nature.
Only idiots like Einstein make assumptions.

| For support, try e.g.
| this experiment: Alvager, Farley, Kjellman & Wallin, PRL 12, 260, (1964)

Light emitted inside a beryllium block is called light in a vacuum. Fucking 
lying bastards, the lot of them.


| > 2)  "In agreement with experience we further assume the quantity
| > 2AB/(t'A-tA) = c to be a universal constant- the velocity of light in empty
| > space.",
| > an admitted assumption that is quite worthless when there is any
| > relative motion between A and B, yet essential to the derivation of the
| > remainder of Einstein's nonsense.

| Idiot. That assumption follow from the assumption (1) above.

Stupid lying cunt. It is independent of 1)

| > 3) The equation
| > ½[tau(0,0,0,t)+tau(0,0,0,t+x'/(c-v)+x'/(c+v))] = tau(x',0,0,t+x'/(c-v)) ,
| > the ½ of which is derived from 2) above and is tantamount to saying
| > (1/3 + 2/3)/2 = 1/3.

| It says nothing like that.

Learn to think... oops, impossible for a moron... my mistake.

| > 4) The missing 0' from that equation, since x' = x-vt, hence 0' = 0-vt,
| > and the equation should be
| > ½[tau(-vt,0,0,t)+tau(-vt,0,0,t+x'/(c-v)+x'/(c+v))] = tau(x',0,0,t+x'/(c-v))
| > at the very least.

| 0 is 0. It makes no sense to write 0'.

You are thicker than three short planks with a tree trunk nailed to the side.
If the frame origins coincide ANYWHEN, and they are displaced through motion 
by a distance -vt, then 0' = 0-vt. You wouldn't know sense if it bit you in 
the arse. Sheesh, you are dumber than moortel, and he was beaten in an IQ 
test by a gorilla.


| > 5) The further assumption "IF we place x' = x-vt ... " without considering
| > IF we place x' = x+vt, from which we derive (using Einstein's method)
| >   tau = (t+xv/c^2)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
| >   xi = (x + vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)" -Paul B. Andersen

| Your point?

Lost on you, obviously.

| > 6) The statements
| >  "But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k,
| > when measured in the stationary system, with the velocity c-v..."
| > and
| > "It follows, further, that the velocity of light c cannot be altered by
| > composition with a velocity less than that of light. For this case we obtain
| > V = (c+w)/(1+w/c) = c."
| > which are contradictory, the first being Galilean, the second being
| > contrary to the vector addition of velocities, an axiom of a vector space.

| The wording here is unfortunate.

ROFLMAO!
The wording here is downright contradictory!

| One has to consider that Einstein
| wanted to make the situation clear to his readers,

Well, he failed. He wrote bullshit, and so do you.

| who obviously were
| accustomed to Galilean relativity.

So am I, and relativity is nonsense.

| Hence the strange formulation in the
| first quote.

Ohhh.... poor Einstein. Let's have a pity part for the idiot.

| > 7) The lack of a check to verify the theory is self-consistent by feeding
| > the new PoR given in 6) into the equation given in 3) and finding a total
| > failure.
| > Check:
| >   (t1-t)/(t2-t)*[tau(-vt,0,0,t)+tau(-vt,0,0,t+x'/V+x'/V)] = tau(x',0,0,t+x'/V)

| It makes no sense at all to insert the equation from (6) into
| the one in (3). Thanks for demonstrating yet again that you haven't
| got the faintest clue of SR.

Is that what your schoolteacher told you in your math lessons?
 It make no sense to check your work?
You never passed a math exam, did you?
How does a fucking stupid lying moron like you get through life?

Androcles.