"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:rIxbd.278479$3T7.14418036@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
>
> "AllYou!" <idaman@conversent.net> wrote in message
> news:Y4WdnQB9wrfE6fPcRVn-iQ@conversent.net...
> >
> > "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
> > in message news:416e6c7b$0$9000$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
> > >
> > > "AllYou!" <idaman@conversent.net> wrote in message
> > > news:1IGdnaGzFNxOw_PcRVn-tw@conversent.net...
> > > >
> > > > "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com>
> > > > wrote in message news:416e1860$0$10539$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
> > > > >
> > > > > "AllYou!" <idaman@conversent.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:gKydnbo7Etm-G_DcRVn-gQ@conversent.net...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So AE claimed that time is what a clock says it is.  Well, that seems to
> > > > > > miss the point of describing time but nonetheless, let's accept that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So if we have two identical, synchronized clocks, and one is accelerated
> > > > > > to S' while the other sits in S, then an observer in S should be
> > > > > > able to tell what time is in S'
> > > > >
> > > > > Silly language.
> > > >
> > > > And this just adds to the list on non-responses.  If you had any
> > > > idea on how to explain a solution to the puzzle,
> > >
> > > If I would feel like reading beyond that silly and sloppy
> > > expression
> > >     " what time it is in S' ",
> > > then I might have found a puzzle to solve.
>
> But of course, I haven't read beyond that silly expression :-)

Sure you did.  You know you did.  Either that, or you knew what was in there
and couldn't bear to look again.  I love it that you're keeping this going
because evey time you do, it gives me another reason to show every lurker
exactly how much of an asshole you really are.

If you had any idea on how
to explain a solution to the puzzle, you, with you superior knowledge and
intellect (as you see it) would have explained what was silly about it and
would have proceeded to give the solution anyway.  Maybe the language is
silly and maybe not.  You've not supported your assertion so I'm guessing
probably not.  The fact that others, regardless of their answers, knew
exactly what I meant further demonstrates that you really have no clue at
all.