"Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@hia.no> wrote in message
news:bn5flt$l2d$1@dolly.uninett.no...
>
> "Androcles" <jp006f9750@blurbblueyonder.co.uk> skrev i melding
>   news:_1alb.10156$vN3.3891@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
> >
> > "HenriWilson" <Henri@the.edge> wrote in message
> > news:46k8pv81hjbptvfrdo4arld0s50molkel6@4ax.com...
> > >  Paul you have never answered any questions I have asked you in the past.
> > >  I can only assume you cannot answer them at all.
> >
> > Of course he can't.
> > Even when I agreed with him, he had to come back to point out my error, then
> > when I replied to that, he wrote back:
> >
> > PAUL #1)
> > quote
> > dtau/dt = 1/g when x = constant
> >  Correct.
> > end quote
> >
> > PAUL #2)
> > quote
> > dtau/dt = g  when x' = constant
> > Correct.
> > end quote
>
> The above is a correct quotation of me.
>
> But the following is written by Androcles,
> not by me.
>
> > Androcles:
> > My summation of PAUL #1)
> > quote
> >  So dtau/dt = g when x is constant
> > end quote
> >
> > My summation of PAUL #2)
> > quote
> > dtau/dt = 1/g when x' is constant.
> > end quote
>
> This is stinking rather badly.
>
> > But then he snipped the remainder, hoping he could hide it under the carpet.
> > You can't hide the stink, though.
> > Here it is..
> > Well done, Paul.
> > You see, you've proved (once again, and who knows how many more times) what
> > I've already accepted by Gardner when he says
> > Part 1)
> > "Of course, the situation is perfectly symmetrical. If you send a beam up
> > and down inside your ship, he will see its path as a V-shape. He will deduce
> > that your clock is slower. "
>
> The above is a correct quotation of Gardner.
>
> But the following is written by Androcles,
> and was never written by Gardner:
>
> > Part 2)
> > "If you send a beam on a V-shaped path inside your ship, he will see its
> > path as a vertical line. He will deduce that your clock is faster."
>
> As I find the odour unbearable, I will snip the rest.
>
> Paul

See what I mean?
Androcles