On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:12:43 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel"
<dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"AndroclesInEngland" <jp006f9750@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:4_fbb.838$5m6.346@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>
>>
>> H, Have you seen Twinkly Dinkly van der Mumble's response, btw?  I know I've
>> never said "Logic is utter gibberish", yet he is claiming I did.
>
>   | >    (A xor B ) => (A or B)
>   | >     0  0  0    1   0  0 0
>   | >     0  1  1    1   0  1 1
>   | >     1  1  0    1   1  1 0
>   | >     1  0  1    1   1  1 1
>   | > QED
>   |
>   | Utter gibberish.
> Evidence:
>   https://home.deds.nl/~dvdm/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Gibberish.html
>
>> I can't
>> find a reference to you saying "Logic is BULL" either.
>
>   | >No way out, according to elementary logic
>   | >                 P ==> Q
>   | > is equivalent with
>   | >           not Q ==> not P
>   |
>   | That's bull!
> Evidence:
>  https://home.deds.nl/~dvdm/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/LogicBull.html

I wasn't claiming that what you wrote was necessarily bull. I was merely
pointing out that the fact that you bothered to write it at all was BULL!