"Randy Poe" <rpoePA@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cs0phvcs4nlfu2k3es1kqbjmfsq58hfm7l@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 17:57:45 GMT, "G. L. Bradford Jr."
> <glbrad01@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Randy Poe" <rpoePA@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:hk4khvcb0isp3463c24uq7f82aueooimd2@4ax.com...
>
> >> >  An entire group of astronomers observed using the Hubble telescope
> >> > that a nova's aura 70,000 light years distant from us is from an event that
> >> > occurred just 1,000 years ago, Earth time, and no one disagrees with
> >> > that statement except me.
> >>
> >> Um, you're going to have to provide a cite on that. I've never heard
> >> of anyone claiming that light could travel 70000 light years in 1000
> >> years.
> >>
> >
> >  NASA.gov site concerning Hubble. I got it, as the attached explanation
> > in caption from the pictures, from Space.com but it was only relaying the
> > release from NASA and the scientists involved.
>
> That's not a cite, that's a vague recollection. I don't trust your
> memory. You're going to have to provide a cite on that.
>
> >  Space.com may have it their
> > archives, or NASA may, but I not going to spend a lot of time searching
> > for it. You may. And it wasn't the first time they've made the same error.
>
> Or it may be you interpreted a correct statement in a strange way,
> which is what I suspect. That's why I asked you for the original.
>
>                  - Randy
>

 Not on your life. I cited it the day it came out and it was discussed for
a couple of weeks after in a thread on this newsgroup. I'm not going to
rehash all that simply for you.

Brad