|
> Einstein had nothing to do with the atomic bomb. I don't buy it that E=mc^2 > has anything to do with this bomb at all. I think it is far more likely that > there was some misinformation spread by America that relativity theories > had anything to do with the bomb. In any case: c' = c and a = g (the two > great insanities of A.E. sucked from his thumb) have little or nothing > to do with splitting atoms and obtaining fast moving particles from them. > I'd say that the bomb has more to do with chemistry, then with wrong > philosophical theories. > > Question: E=Amc^2 is just the kinetic energy of light for A = .5. what > is so presumed special about this formula, where E=1/2mv^2 is simple > kinetic energy. Another fuckup? Another little piece of crap floating > around endlessly from A.E. because of an hysterical press and phycisists > taking advantage ? > Well ? > -- > jos |
|
Index Original post and context: almt5v$e23$6@news1.xs4all.nl |