"JanPB" <filmart@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:1157122656.260028.268040@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
| Sorcerer wrote:
| > "JanPB" <filmart@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > news:1157093749.063074.180720@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
| > | Sorcerer wrote:
| > | > "JanPB" <filmart@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > | > news:1157088662.093996.79600@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| > | > | Sorcerer wrote:
| > | > | > "JanPB" <filmart@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > | > | > news:1157078112.722141.238790@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
| > | > | > | Sorcerer wrote:
| > | > | > | > "JanPB" <filmart@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > | > | > | > news:1157008520.754088.275210@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
| > | > | > | > | Koobee Wublee wrote:
| > | > | > | > | > Sorcerer wrote:
| > | > | > | > | > > <rambus2005@yahoo.com> wrote in message
| > | > | > | > | > > news:1156952763.771923.287980@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
| > | > | > | > | > > | Look what the cat dragged in from Apeiron (an antirelativistic
| > | > | > | > | > > | journal):
| > | > | > | > | > > |
| > | > | > | > | > > | http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/Pre2001/V05NO1PDF/V05n1lut.pdf
| > | > | > | > | > >
| > | > | > | > | > > Yes...
| > | > | > | > | > > Look what the cat dragged in from Annalen der Physik, a crackpot journal.
| > | > | > | > | > >    http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
| > | > | > | > | > >
| > | > | > | > | > > Even cranks get published.
| > | > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > In that 1905 paper, I am discovering worng mathematics everyday.
| > | > | > | > | > Why is it that no one else has noticed?
| > | > | > | > |
| > | > | > | > | Think.
| > | > | > | > |
| > | > | > | > | > For example, in section 3,
| > | > | > | > | > Einstein's derivation of Lorentz Transform is utterly
| > | > | > | > | > nonsense and full of errors.
| > | > | > | > |
| > | > | > | > | No, you must have misunderstood something. The derivation 
| > | > | > | > | is elementary linear algebra and calculus.
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > HAHAHA!
| > | > | > | > Elementary linear algebra and calculus:
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > "2AB/(t'A-tA) = c" -- Einstein.
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > Light travels from A to A in time t'A-tA = 0/0.
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | Well, you assume nonsense, you get nonsense. What else did you expect?
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | > The first thing to learn is not to divide by zero.
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | It is you who is dividing by zero - why do you admonish others?
| > | > | >
| > | > | > HAHAHAHA! That's not my equation, you drunken shithead.
| > | > |
| > | > | Yes, but the equation is fine - it is you who is dividing by zero.
| > | >
| > | > No, the equation it isn't "fine", drunken shithead.
| > | > You obviously don't know the difference between  c and -c, and
| > | > neither did the moron Einstein.
| > |
| > | c and -c is irrelevant here.
| >
| >  It's amusing to me to see how far he can go with this. Right now we
| > are reduced to elementary arithmetic (b-a=c-b implying 2b=a+c) and
| > elements of functions. With a bit more work we'll get down to the
| > nitty-gritty of the empty set soon.
|
| Oh stop this nonsense. You know very well what I'm talking about. (I'm
| done with this thread).

Beaten by logic, huh?  You snip, you lose.
Run away, moron,  I have the last word.

 How far is it from A to A, shithead?
Bilewacky: "definitely not zero"
Ref:  news:1157093749.063074.180720@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com


THE NITIY GRITTY OF THE EMPTY SET :
A-A <> {0}.
We are there at last, the empty set is not empty according
to Bilewacky.

How come you have not been published, crank?
Can it be because:
"This is PHYSICS, not math or logic, and "proof" is completely
irrelevant." -- Tom Roberts, starring in his latest movie, "Humpty Roberts
and the Meaning of Words <Shrug>"
and co-starring Jan Bilewacky, "x-x =/= 0"?

Your fumble is immortalised but I'll just keep a reference to it for now,
I'm all out of granite blocks to carve it on.

Androcles.