"EjP" <nospam@die.spammers.die> wrote in message
news:c33foe$le0$1@info4.fnal.gov...
>
> kenseto wrote:
> > "John Zinni" <j_zinni.NOCRAP@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> > news:DNZ4c.71$E71.43469@news20.bellglobal.com...
> >
> >>"kenseto" <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote in message
> >>news:1058oqv6pm8oa77@corp.supernews.com...
> >>
> >>>> Huu... ???
> >>>>
> >>>> Are you telling me I cant equate x' with x' ???
> >>>
> >>> NO...from the observer's (the unprimed frame) point of view
> >>> the prime frame's clock can run fast or slow. The primed frame's
> >>> light path length for a rod can be longer or shorter than the
> >>> observer's light path length for the same rod. The observer
> >>> must determine which of the two transforms to use to make
> >>> his calculations.. He cannot use both becxause only one of the
> >>> transform will give him the correct answer..
> >>
> >> From your original post ...
> >>
> >>
> >>> 2. The transform equations:
> >>>   x'= Faa/Fab[x- t(Faa-Fab)(lambda)]
> >>>   t'= Faa/Fab[t- x(Faa-Fab)/(Faa^2)(lambda)]
> >>>   y'=y
> >>>   z'=z
> >>>
> >>> AND/OR
> >>>
> >>>   x'= Faa/Fab[x+ t(Faa-Fab)(lambda)]
> >>>   t'= Faa/Fab[t+x(Faa-Fab)/(Faa^2)(lambda)]
> >>>   y'=y
> >>>   z'=z
> >>
> >> What the hell does the AND in "AND/OR" mean Ken???
> >
> >
> > It means that one of these two sets of transforms is the correct transform.
> > But the observer don't know which set so he will have to do both
> > and see which will fit the observation.
> >
> > Ken Seto
> >
> >
>
> I hope Dirk is listening.  That one's good even for you, Ken.

ROTFLOL....you are a runt of the SRians. You don't have the
mental capacity to comprenhend this.

Ken Seto