On 24 Mar, 10:17, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote in 
> messagenews:1174725457.082237.137200@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> > On Mar 23, 2:07 pm, j...@tele2.se wrote:
> >>
> >> How come that simultan events for an object within SR can for a moving
> >> object within the theory take place at different spaces.
>
> > ...because simultaneity is relative.
>
> > This is discussed in every SR textbook. Try reading one.
>
> but preferably not before the age of 13 :-)
>
> Dirk Vdm

So this is where the dumbfucks gather up trying to scare an opponent
away by imtimidation but actually not put forward any argument lol.

Well i am used you brainless lowIQ morons, only 'TOTAL INCAPACITY OF
ANY STRAIGHT LINE OF THOUGHT* could lead anyone to beleive that two
*SIMULTANEOUS EVENTS IN SAME FRAME* actually can take place at two
different places in space. I don't care how fucking much you want to
dilate the time in the frame, *IDIOTS THE UNSYMMETRIC RATIO WILL BE
THE SAME*. Because you most stupid fuckers do no realise that you deal
with an vector dependent transformation.

YOUR FUCKING SHIP HAVE TWO CLOCKS, ONE IN THE BACK AND ONE IN THE
FRONT AND THEY WILL SHOW SAME TIME UNTIL THE FUCKING SHIP HALTS

*****AND THAT IS BECAUSE......................
THE FUCKING SHIP CAN NOT STOP AT TWO PLACES IN THE SAME MOMENT*******

So now you low IQ morons go fucking masturbate dream of Captain Kirk
and wormholes. You fucking loo diggers.

JT