dwhig265@aol.com (Dwhig265) wrote in message news:<20031020183433.15981.00000371@mb-m19.aol.com>...
>    You don't need to lecture me on relativity. If I thought it was worth
> reading, I would have done so long ago. Any one who says there is no center to
> an expanding universe gets no credence from me. You will say the opposite of
> course so we are at an impasse since you can't prove you're right and
> apparently no one can prove me wrong which is what I was really trying to find
> out I guess. Thanks for posting in a civil manner.
>                  Regards, Dwain W. Higginbotham

I offer $100 to the first person who can _prove_ to me the existence
of terrestrial gravity; that is, that when I let go of something, it
will fall towards the ground.  I have developed a theory that says
things won't fall, but will hover in midair.  Anyone who says that
something will start moving without anything pushing it gets no
credence from me.  Such an event would merit the title "miraculous"
if true.  Note, of course, that I will not actually read responses
to my posts, especially if they attempt to explain to me what
gravity actually is.  If I thought gravity was worth reading about,
I would have done so a long time ago.  But thank you for your
civility in your followups (that is, if you actually are civil; I
won't know!).